Friday, December 17, 2010

Marist brother jailed
Former Marist brother jailed on indecency charges
The Dominion Post Last updated 12:00 17/12/2010SharePrint Text Size MAARTEN HOLL/Dominion PostBede HamptonRelevant offers

Crime Incestuous brother 'abused sister's trust' Staff reeling at fraud Killer may get temporary release Gift returns Simon's independence Mellory's killers told to give up Mums sentenced for money laundering Arming police would not make job any safer, says rural officer Woman gambled away stolen $1m A former Marist brother who taught in Masterton in the 1970s has been jailed for two years and six months on indecency charges.

The two victims each rejected a $10,000 emotional harm payment that Bede Thomas Hampton, 62, had hoped would keep him out of prison.

In the High Court at Wellington today Justice Forrie Miller said the victims had been vulnerable as children, Hampton had seen that, and exploited it.

Hampton, who has an interior decorating company with his wife in Australia, had pleaded guilty to two charges of indecently touching one of the boys but still denies having committed other offences.

A jury found him guilty of 11 charges of indecent assault, but found him not guilty of 10 charges including two of sodomy. It could not reach verdicts on two charges and Hampton was discharged on another during the trial due to lack of evidence.

The charges dated from 1973 to 1975.

Hampton taught at St Joseph's College, Masterton, where the two victims were boarders.

He left the Marist brothers when he was 29, in the late 1970s.

Justice Miller said the effect on the victims had been severe. Both thought their achievement as adults had been reduced as a result of what Hampton had done to them.

One said the offending led to an addiction to alcohol and drugs.

Hampton denied a sexual motivation for even the limited indecency which he agreed had taken place, which was twice briefly touching a boy's penis.

The judge said that when it came time for Hampton to be considered for parole he may have to confront his failure to acknowledge the sexual motivation.

He doubted Hampton had genuine empathy for the victims and his remorse was limited.

A probation officer's report said Hampton's true concern seemed to be for himself, his family and his business.

The court heard Hampton's business was struggling and may fail. His family home in Queensland was likely to be sold to repay the $750,000 loan secured against it.

The first allegations against Hampton arose in 2002. He and his wife decided not to tell their two children until recently. Hampton's name was suppressed until his trial started last month.

His lawyer, Christopher Stevenson, said Hampton's family continued to support him. His children knew him and stood behind him unwaveringly, he said.

No comments: