Sunday, October 31, 2010

Priest charged with stalking

http://northport.patch.com/articles/priest-charged-with-stalking
Priest Charged With Stalking40.89896-73.314229primaryUpdated: Priest Charged With StalkingNorthport Veterans Affairs Medical Center79 Middleville Rd, Northport, NY/listings/northport-veterans-affairs-medical-center335859 /locations/2241089
40.901602-73.342402primaryUpdated: Priest Charged With StalkingSt. Philip Neri Church344 Main St, Northport, NY/listings/st-philip-neri-church335604 /locations/2241090
A priest staying at St. Philip Neri in Northport was asked to leave following his arrest.
By Kelly Campbell | Email the author | October 19, 2010 A priest given hospitality privileges in the St. Philip Neri rectory was asked to leave following his arrest for stalking.

On Sept.21, the Rev. Rashid Peter Francis was charged with fourth-degree stalking, a misdemeanor, according to Suffolk County police records. The incident occurred April 1, 2007.

Since 2005, Francis, a Franciscan friar who is not a priest of the Diocese of Rockville Centre, was granted hospitality to live in the parish while pursuing his work as a chaplain at the Northport Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Francis' home parish is St. Anthony of Padua in downtown Manhattan.

Upon hearing of the arrest, Bishop William Murphy revoked Father Francis' hospitality privileges. As a result, Father Francis has left the parish rectory.

Updated: VAMC Public Affairs and Media Coordinator Joe Sledge said that Francis is still employed by the medical center. "That's all I can say about that," he said.

The church is cooperating fully with law enforcement, according to a letter in the parish bulletin to the congregation from Father Peter Dooley, who replaced Father Peter Garry when he retired in May.

Francis has retained Commack attorney Anthony Gallo. His next court appearance is scheduled for Nov. 22.

In New York State, a person is guilty of stalking in the fourth degree when he or she "intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, engages in a course of conduct directed at a specific person, and knows or reasonably should know that such conduct is likely to cause reasonable fear of material harm to the physical health, safety or property of such person, a family member, or an acquaintance; or causes material harm to the mental or emotional health of the victim by following, telephoning or initiating communication or contact with such person, a family member, or an acquaintance, and the actor was previously informed to cease that conduct; or is likely to cause the victim to reasonably fear that his or her employment, business or career is threatened by appearing, telephoning or initiating communication or contact at the victim's place of employment or business, and the actor was previously informed to cease that conduct."

No comments: